Private Individual

The case involves Ramapuram Regional Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. as the decree holder and multiple debtors including Thankachan Narayanan and others. The court addressed the execution petition concerning the repayment of a decretal amount.

Kizhathadiyoor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. is the decree holder represented by its secretary, Sheeja C. Nair. Daisy John is the debtor involved in the execution petition.

The case involves Edanadu Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. as the decree holder and three debtors including Jayasankar V. T, Suresh K. C, and Ramani V. T. The petition was regarding an execution order which has been finally heard.

The case involves Edanadu Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. represented by its Secretary against debtors Jayasankar V. T, Suresh K. C, and Ramani V. T regarding an execution petition. The matter was settled in mediation.

Roby Joseph Devasya is the plaintiff represented by his father Joseph Devasya. The case involves a compromise agreement filed by both parties.

Kavumkandam Granites, represented by Silvi Joseph, filed a suit against Jomon Joseph for illegally cutting a roadway through their property. The case involves a counterclaim from Jomon Joseph for a declaration of his rights over the property.

The case involves S. Shanmugha Sundaram Pilla (Decree Holder) and Meenachil Rubber Marketing and Processing Co-operative Society Ltd. (Debtor). The Execution Petition has been heard and subsequently satisfied.

The case involves Ramapuram Regional Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. represented by its Secretary, Santhosh Sebastian, against Joseph C. A. The bank has submitted that the Execution Petition is satisfied, and it is thus closed.

Joy Joseph is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Authorised Officer of the Kerala State Co-operative Bank Ltd. The case revolves around the claim that the bank's proceedings under the SARFAESI Act concerning agricultural land are illegal.

The complainant, Balakrishnan, alleged that the accused, Salim Thayyil, issued a cheque that was dishonored. The case revolves around the repayment of ₹4,00,000 taken by the complainant under the pretense of a franchise agreement that was never fulfilled by the accused.