Private Individual

M/s Pentatech Associates and others filed a suit against Benny Abraham for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiffs allege they were forcefully dispossessed from the metal crusher unit operated under a lease agreement.

The case involves Edanadu Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. as the decree holder and Jayasankar V. T, Suresh K. C, and Ramani V. T as debtors. The court dealt with the execution of a decree in this matter.

The case involves Edanadu Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. represented by its Secretary against debtors Jayasankar V. T, Ramani V. T, and Suresh K. C regarding the execution petition. The court has heard the petition and has closed the execution petition.

The Edanadu Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. is the decree holder represented by its Secretary, while Jayasankar V. T, Suresh K. C, and Ramani V. T are the debtors. The case pertains to an execution petition that has been finally heard.

The case involves Edanadu Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. seeking execution against Jayasankar V. T and others. The matter was settled in mediation.

Edanadu Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. is the decree holder, while Jayasankar V. T, Suresh K. C, and Ramani V. T are the debtors. The matter was settled in mediation.

The case involves Edanadu Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. as the decree holder and Jayasankar V. T, Suresh K. C, and Ramani V. T as debtors. The matter was settled in mediation.

The case involves Ramapuram Regional Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. as the decree holder and Jinto Augustin, Augusthy Varkey, and Shobhanakumary N. N as debtors. The matter was settled in mediation and the execution petition is closed.

Roy Joseph and Tomy Joseph, brothers, are involved in a dispute over a paddy field they allegedly co-own. The plaintiff seeks partition and boundary fixation due to the defendant's alleged mischief.

The plaintiff, Shobha Thomas, seeks to evict the defendant, Kalesh Joseph, from her property due to his illegal occupation and failure to pay the agreed sale consideration. The defendant has been residing in the property since 2014 without completing the sale transaction.