Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O. S. No. 112/2018

Case between Roby Joseph Devasya et al vs P. J Joseph et al regarding a compromise agreement

Court
Munsiff Court Pala
Judge
Sri. Hasheem S
Order Date
2025-06-16
Duration
approximately-7 years 0 days
Case Closed
Mon, 06/16/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Roby Joseph Devasya is the plaintiff represented by his father Joseph Devasya. The case involves a compromise agreement filed by both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in accordance with the compromise agreement filed by both parties, with all terms deemed lawful.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in accordance with the compromise agreement filed by both parties, with all terms deemed lawful.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The compromise agreement was considered lawful by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
All terms in the agreement are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed in terms of the agreement. The compromise agreement shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Roby Joseph Devasya
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joseph Devasya
Party Age
78
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P. J Joseph
Party Age
84
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kunjannamma Joseph
Party Age
72
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Layochan Joseph
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jose Joseph
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheelamma
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise agreement as IA 4/25
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Seby Cherian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Cyriac James
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed in terms of the agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Roby Joseph Devasya et al vs P. J Joseph et al regarding a compromise agreement
Case Code Year
Case between Roby Joseph Devasya et al vs P. J Joseph et al regarding a compromise agreement

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Pala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 06/16/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Jose J. Edavoor et al vs Devasya regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between C. J Joseph et al vs Laly Sebastian et al regarding Suit dismissed for default.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thomas Joseph vs Jose Antony Puthenveetil et al regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Viswanathan Nair et al vs Dr. Sangeeth Raveendran regarding settlement in Adalath.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Abraham Philipose et al vs John Mathyas et al regarding injunction and fixation of boundary
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won