Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 66/2021

Case between C. J Joseph et al vs Laly Sebastian et al regarding Suit dismissed for default.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Judge
Sri. Hasheem S
Order Date
2025-10-13
Duration
approximately-4 years 0 days
Case Closed
Mon, 10/13/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are represented by C. J Joseph and others, and the case involves a suit that has been dismissed. The plaintiffs were absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and lack of instruction from their counsel.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and lack of instruction from their counsel.
Key Reasoning:
The defendants were present while the plaintiffs were absent, leading to the dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. Counsel submitted no instruction from the party. Defendant represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C. J Joseph
Party Age
78
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lookachan Joseph
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thomas Mathew
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K. U Francis
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sebastian V. S
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Laly Sebastian
Relation
Proprietor
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Laly Sebastian
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mutholy Grama Panchayath
Relation
represented by Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Govt. of Kerala
Relation
represented by District Collector Kottayam
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jose Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Cyriac James
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
the suit is dismissed for default

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between C. J Joseph et al vs Laly Sebastian et al regarding Suit dismissed for default.
Case Code Year
Case between C. J Joseph et al vs Laly Sebastian et al regarding Suit dismissed for default.

Quick Facts

Location
Pala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Case Filed
Wed, 10/13/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 10/13/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 10/27/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Jose J. Edavoor et al vs Devasya regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Roby Joseph Devasya et al vs P. J Joseph et al regarding a compromise agreement
Munsiff Court Pala
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thomas Joseph vs Jose Antony Puthenveetil et al regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Viswanathan Nair et al vs Dr. Sangeeth Raveendran regarding settlement in Adalath.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Abraham Philipose et al vs John Mathyas et al regarding injunction and fixation of boundary
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won