Private Individual

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, seeks to recover a loan amount from the defendant, Vakkayil Vydhyasala, which availed business loans under the bank's scheme. The defendant has failed to repay the loan amount despite multiple reminders.

The case involves a dispute between The Canara Bank Kaduthuruthy Branch and M/s Fast Track Agencies. The matter was settled through a compromise agreement.

Bank of Baroda filed a suit against Anand Vijayan regarding default dismissal of their case. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

The plaintiff, Vaikathappan Nidhi Ltd., represented by its Managing Director C.K.Praveen, claims that the defendants defaulted on the repayment of a loan of Rs.35,000/- which was sanctioned for self-employment. The plaintiff is seeking to recover the outstanding balance with interest.

The plaintiff, Appachan @ Kuriakose, seeks a declaration of his easement rights over a way claimed to be obstructed by the defendants, Shaji Kurian and Jensy Shaji. The defendants contended that the way is part of their property and denied the plaintiff's claims.

Gentleman Chits Funds Co. (India) Pvt. Ltd. filed a complaint against Pratheesh Manoharan K. for an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The matter was settled, and the accused was acquitted.

The complainant, Gentleman Chits Funds Company, alleged that the accused, Aswathy P.P., defaulted on payment concerning a chitty transaction and issued a dishonored cheque. The court found the accused guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Aji M.B. filed a suit against Rameshkumar C.M. The matter was settled in Adalath.

Brahamamangalam Gramaswaraj Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., represented by its Secretary, is involved in an execution petition against Kuttappan. The court dismissed the execution petition for default due to non-production of documents.

The plaintiffs, a registered association of farmers, filed for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who are their neighbors. The defendants threatened to trespass on the plaintiffs' paddy field and conduct duck farming, which could harm the farmers' cultivation.