Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O S 129/2023

Case between The Canara Bank Kaduthuruthy Branch vs M/s Fast Track Agencies regarding a settlement.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-03-20
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 03/20/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a dispute between The Canara Bank Kaduthuruthy Branch and M/s Fast Track Agencies. The matter was settled through a compromise agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise agreement. The terms of the settlement are legally enforceable.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Legal Benefit Fund and Court Fee Stamp and costs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise agreement. The terms of the settlement are legally enforceable.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The matter was settled through a legally enforceable compromise agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The matter was settled through a legally enforceable compromise agreement.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of settlement appears to be legally enforceable.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit decreed in terms of compromise. Compromise agreement shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The Canara Bank Kaduthuruthy Branch
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Fast Track Agencies
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joby Varghese.K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.N.Jayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Matter settled. Compromise petition filed. Terms of settlement appears to be legally enforceable. Suit decreed in terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between The Canara Bank Kaduthuruthy Branch vs M/s Fast Track Agencies regarding a settlement.
Case Code Year
Case between The Canara Bank Kaduthuruthy Branch vs M/s Fast Track Agencies regarding a settlement.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Case Closed
Thu, 03/20/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Anand Vijayan regarding default dismissal
Court of the Munsiff, Vaikom
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Vinod.S regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank Thalayolaparambu Branch vs Shijin Daniel, Sabeena et al regarding suit dismissal.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank et al vs Mathew @ Roy Thomas, George Joseph regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Littiya Thomas et al regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won