Case Summary
Bank of Baroda filed a suit against Anand Vijayan regarding default dismissal of their case. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was absent and not represented. The judgment was pronounced on the same day.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bank of Baroda
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anand Vijayan
- Party Age
- 33
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anand Vijayan
- Party Age
- 33
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Binny Joseph.P.Palamattom
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Jeenu Abraham
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
the suit dismissed for default
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Anand Vijayan regarding default dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Anand Vijayan regarding default dismissal