Private Individual

Canara Bank has filed a suit against M/s. Bharath Garments for the recovery of loan amounts. The defendants defaulted on their repayment obligations despite repeated demands.

The case involves Union Bank of India seeking to recover a loan amount from Guru Kripa Micro Unit and its members. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite repeated demands, leading to this legal action.

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, filed a suit against the defendant, Suneer.A, for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendant defaulted on repayments despite receiving multiple reminders and legal notices.

The plaintiffs, including Perayam Sri. Bhoothanadha Temple and its president, filed a suit for injunction. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of plaintiffs and lack of representation.

The plaintiffs, R.Bahuleyan and B.Devarajan, are seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants, Prasad.K, Bindhu, Perayam Grama Panchayath, and The Deputy Director of Panchayat, to demolish an unauthorized construction affecting their property. The defendants have constructed a thatched shop without permitted authorization.

The petitioners, Aravindakshan and his son Akhil Aravindan, filed a review petition to challenge an exparte decree granted against the defendants. The suit sought to recover a total amount of Rs.8,38,660/- with interest from the defendants who are the legal heirs of Anilkumar.

This case involves the decree holder Fishermen Welfare Society and the judgment debtors F.Jakson and others regarding an execution petition. The decree holder filed a petition stating that the decree was satisfied.

The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, filed a suit against the defendant, Johnkutty, for the realization of a loan amount. The defendant failed to repay the loan despite multiple reminders.

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, filed a suit against the defendant, Manoj, for the realization of an outstanding loan amount. The defendant defaulted on the loan repayment despite being notified.

The plaintiff, Nizarudeen, claims ownership and possession of property and seeks to fix boundaries against the defendants who are allegedly attempting to unlawfully take possession of the property. The defendants have been accused of causing damage and trespassing.