Private Individual

Federal Bank filed a suit against Varkey. T.C for the recovery of a loan. The plaintiff claims that the defendant defaulted on loan repayments, amounting to over Rs. 16 lakhs.

This case involves South Indian Bank seeking to recover loan amounts from M/s Silver Edge and its proprietor, Mr. Muhammed Rafi. The defendants failed to repay the loan as per the agreed terms, leading the bank to file this suit.

Kerala Gramin Bank is the plaintiff, while Salin. K.K and Chandran. K.K are the defendants. The case involves an execution petition that was settled in mediation.

Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited filed a petition against Shameema. A.V. The petitioner did not co-operate during the hearing.

Canara Bank filed a petition against M/S Fortune Trade Links and its Proprietrix Smt. Bijila. B.G for attachment of property due to failure to repay a loan. The respondents allegedly tried to alienate their property.

M/s Union Bank of India has filed a petition to ensure the respondents do not dispose of their property, which could delay the execution of a decree in the underlying suit. The court is considering a conditional order of attachment.

Federal Bank is the plaintiff. The defendants include Lakshmikutty Amma, Sooriadas Puthiya Parambil, and Rajan Nair. The case involves a settlement of the relief sought by the bank.

The case involves Manager of Kerala Gramin Bank as the petitioner and Melambath Babu as the respondent. The petitioner filed an Execution Petition which was dismissed as not pressed.

M/s. Grand Trading Company and Mr. Rasheed.M, petitioners, filed a restoration petition to set aside an exparte decree passed against them for failing to repay loans to Canara Bank, the respondent. They argued that they could not attend the trial due to business commitments but the bank contended that they had multiple opportunities to appear.

The petitioners, M/s. Imprint Polymers and its partners, filed a restoration petition to set aside an exparte decree passed against them. The respondent, Canara Bank, contended that the petitioners had failed to appear despite several opportunities provided.