Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
CS.13/2024

Case between Canara Bank Branch II vs M/S Fortune Trade Links and Smt. Bijila. B.G regarding loan repayment and attachment of property.

Court
COURT OF SUBORDINATE JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Judge
Smt.Priyanka. S
Order Date
2025-06-27
Duration
approximately-1 year 2 months
Case Code No.
13
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a petition against M/S Fortune Trade Links and its Proprietrix Smt. Bijila. B.G for attachment of property due to failure to repay a loan. The respondents allegedly tried to alienate their property.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the conditional order of attachment to be closed as the petitioner did not take further steps after the attachment was found ineffective.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the conditional order of attachment to be closed as the petitioner did not take further steps after the attachment was found ineffective.
Key Reasoning:
The conditional order of attachment could not be made absolute due to the failure of the petitioner to identify the properties for attachment.
Why Defendant Won:
The conditional order of attachment could not be made absolute due to the failure of the petitioner to identify the properties for attachment.
Supporting Evidence
The petition schedule properties were not attached since they were not identified.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result IA stands closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank Branch II
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jijin T.M
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/S Fortune Trade Links
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt. Bijila. B.G
Party Age
38
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Sreedevi K.L
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Mujeeburahiman. K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Closed
Description:
Conditional order of attachment was sought but not made absolute.
Evidence:
In the light of the report of Amin, it is seen that the conditional order of attachment passed cannot be made absolute.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Koyilandy
Common Reasons
Case Code
CS.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Koyilandy
Case Filed
Wed, 04/03/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank et al vs Vishnu, Kunhikkanaran regarding settlement of suit
COURT OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Arun. M et al regarding settlement in mediation.
COURT OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Union Bank of India vs Christy Mathew et al regarding security for execution of decree
COURT OF SUBORDINATE JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/S Imprint Polymers et al regarding EP proceedings.
COURT OF SUBORDINATE JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/S Grand Trading Company regarding restoration of civil suit
COURT OF SUBORDINATE JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won