Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RPIA 24/2024

Case between M/s. Grand Trading Company vs Canara Bank regarding setting aside of exparte decree

Court
COURT OF SUBORDINATE JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Judge
Smt.Priyanka. S
Order Date
2025-07-31
Duration
approximately-1 year 6 months
Case Code No.
24
Case Closed
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Grand Trading Company and Mr. Rasheed.M, petitioners, filed a restoration petition to set aside an exparte decree passed against them for failing to repay loans to Canara Bank, the respondent. They argued that they could not attend the trial due to business commitments but the bank contended that they had multiple opportunities to appear.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the restoration petition to set aside the exparte decree and provided an opportunity for the petitioners to contest the matter on payment of costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of case and setting aside the exparte decree on payment of costs.
Case Type
Commercial
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition to set aside the exparte decree and provided an opportunity for the petitioners to contest the matter on payment of costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Petitioners provided sufficient cause for their non-appearance.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Petitioners provided sufficient cause for their non-appearance.
Supporting Evidence
It is seen that the petitioners can be provided an opportunity to contest the matter and this restoration petition can be allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, RPIA is allowed by setting aside the exparte decree dated 11.01.2024, on payment of costs of Rs.10,000/- to respondent/plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Grand Trading Company
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Rasheed. M
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.V.M.Joy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Sreedevi.K.L
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioners requested to set aside the exparte decree passed on 11.01.2024.
Evidence:
In the result, RPIA is allowed by setting aside the exparte decree dated 11.01.2024.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked as evidence from the side of the plaintiff during the trial.
Reference:
Exts. A1 to A13

Case Classification

Case Type
Commercial
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Koyilandy
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
RPIA
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Koyilandy, Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Koyilandy
Case Filed
Tue, 01/11/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Cholmandalam Investment and Finance Co.Ltd et al vs Arjun P.R regarding Arbitration proceedings
COMMERCIAL COURT OF KOZHIKODE
Arbitration Defendant Won
Case between Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited vs Shameema. A.V regarding dismissal for default.
COURT OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Arbitration Case Defendant Won
Case between M/s. Imprint Polymers et al vs Canara Bank regarding setting aside exparte decree
COURT OF SUBORDINATE JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dayaana K. vs Marunadan Malayalee et al regarding damages and mandatory injunction.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Punnya Ranjith vs State of Kerala, Deputy Director Education, General Convenor regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won