Government

Petitioners are seeking a review of the judgment and decree in OS 1391/2005, alleging the court's error in not following Kerala amendment to Order 34 of Civil Procedure Code. Respondents argue the review is not maintainable.

Case involves a dispute over the accuracy of a survey plan filed by an Advocate Commissioner in relation to specified pathways and property extents.

Case involves petition for execution of decree regarding drainage water and waste reaching the plaintiff's property in violation of a permanent prohibitory injunction.

Case involves Haniya and others suing Muhammed over a property access dispute. Plaintiff seeks an injunction to prevent defendant from obstructing a road needed to access their property.

Case involves Govindan as the Decree Holder against Melvi and others as the Judgment Debtors. The case has been decided with the property being delivered.

Involves Archana K. as the plaintiff filing a suit for mandatory injunction against The State of Kerala and others. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.

Involves a dispute between multiple parties over the right of way through a property. Plaintiffs claimed easement of necessity; defendants contested the right to use the path. Court ruled in favor of plaintiffs granting them right of way and injunction against obstruction.

Case between Pavithra Satheesan and others vs General Convener et al, Appeal Committee Chairman and State of Kerala regarding mandatory injunction.

Case between plaintiff Vismaya.M., Sindhu and defendants The State of Kerala et al. It is a mandatory injunction suit.

Case involves Kadeeja suing Saidalavi, Fathima, and Nafeesa for partition of property.