I.A No.02/2025 in OS No.100/2017

Case between Rojar Antony Vakayil vs Vasudevan Nair et al regarding Commission Report and Survey Plan discrepancies

Court
THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-11-13
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Case involves a dispute over the accuracy of a survey plan filed by an Advocate Commissioner in relation to specified pathways and property extents.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petitioner's application was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Case
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Rojar Antony Vakayil (72 years years) Vakayil House, Thottumugham Kara, Keezhmadu Village, Aluva Taluk

Defendants

Vasudevan Nair (Age not specified years) Pulikkayathu House, Okkal Kara, Chelamattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Komalam Vasudevan (Age not specified years) Pulikkayathu House, Okkal Kara, Chelamattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Kavitha Vasudevan (Age not specified years) Pulikkayathu House, Okkal Kara, Chelamattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Aswathy Vasudevan (Age not specified years) Pulikkayathu House, Okkal Kara, Chelamattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission report and Survey plan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Petitioner challenges accuracy of survey plan and report submitted by Commissioner
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases