Case Summary
Case involves a dispute over the accuracy of a survey plan filed by an Advocate Commissioner in relation to specified pathways and property extents.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Case
Final Judgment
No
The petitioner's application was dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rojar Antony Vakayil
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vasudevan Nair
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Komalam Vasudevan
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kavitha Vasudevan
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aswathy Vasudevan
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission report and Survey plan
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Petitioner challenges accuracy of survey plan and report submitted by Commissioner
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rojar Antony Vakayil vs Vasudevan Nair et al regarding Commission Report and Survey Plan discrepancies
Case Code Year
Case between Rojar Antony Vakayil vs Vasudevan Nair et al regarding Commission Report and Survey Plan discrepancies