Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 287 OF 2012

Case between Thekkepurath Beerankutty's son et al vs Kanhirathingal Mammutty & Nedumballi Beepathumma's children et al regarding declaration, way, and perpetual injunction

Court
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-12-21
Duration
7 years 6 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Involves a dispute between multiple parties over the right of way through a property. Plaintiffs claimed easement of necessity; defendants contested the right to use the path. Court ruled in favor of plaintiffs granting them right of way and injunction against obstruction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiffs granted right of way through defendant's property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Declaration, Way, Perpetual Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Established common ownership and right to easement of necessity through thorough documentation and witness testimonies.

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Moideen (65 years) Rabiya (Age not specified years) Kadeeja (40 years) Rahmath (38 years) Safiya (37 years) Musthafa (35 years)

Defendants

Fathimakutty alias Malumma (Age not specified years) Hamzakutty (48 years) Enikutty (60 years) Abdusalam (38 years) Saidalavi (36 years)

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs have easement of necessity right to use a way through B schedule property to A schedule property
Evidence:
Court findings on common ownership, partition deed, and right of easement
Relief Type: Setting out a Way
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants directed to set out a way through B schedule property to A schedule property
Evidence:
Court judgment stating the width of the way to be set out
Relief Type: Perpetual Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants restrained from obstructing the use of the way to A schedule property
Evidence:
Court order for perpetual injunction against defendants

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Purchase Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of jenmam right in the property
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of tax payment for the property
Reference:
A3
Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Title deed of defendant No. 2's property
Reference:
B1

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2012 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases