Government

This case involves Sudhakaran as the petitioner/original defendant and the Travancore Devaswam Board and Sub Group Officer as respondents/original plaintiffs. The petitioner sought to restore a previous petition that had been dismissed due to non-payment of costs.

The petitioner is the Additional Principal Chief Forest Conservator represented by the Kollam Working Plan Officer, while the respondent is B. Venugopal, a retired Range Forest Officer. The case involves a petition to set aside a previous order and restore a suit.

This case involves plaintiffs Anju, Vinodkumar, and Ambikavathiyamma against the Kerala State and others regarding a dispute over possession of property and a boundary wall. The plaintiffs claim ownership and seek injunction against the defendants who issued a notice regarding the wall's alleged illegal construction.

This case involves the plaintiff Sarojini Amma who is seeking a declaration, partition, and injunction against the defendants including Madhusoodanan Pillai and others. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff remained absent during the hearing.

The plaintiff, Maria Dana Dhanavathy, filed a suit for injunction against the defendants, including the State of Kerala. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.

The petition was filed by the State of Kerala and its officials seeking to restore an earlier application dismissed for default. The original plaintiff, Sajeev, contended that the petition for restoration was filed without justification for the delay.

The case involves Aji and Nisharaj as plaintiffs who filed a petition against the Kerala State Financial Enterprises Limited to set aside a prior order and restore their suit. The petition was heard on 18-12-2025.

The plaintiff, Nelson.A., is seeking recovery of pensionary benefits from the Kerala State Electricity Board and its associated defendants. The case revolves around whether the plaintiff's previous service in the KSFE should be counted towards his pension.

A. Shefiyulla filed a petition to restore a suit that was dismissed for default. The court found insufficient reasons to restore the petition and dismissed it.

This suit is filed by the plaintiffs for Declaration and injunction. The plaintiffs remained absent and not ready to adduce any evidence.