Case Summary
A. Shefiyulla filed a petition to restore a suit that was dismissed for default. The court found insufficient reasons to restore the petition and dismissed it.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition to restore the previous suit due to lack of sufficient reasons.
Key Reasoning:
Insufficient reasons provided in the supporting affidavit.
Insufficient reasons provided in the supporting affidavit.
Why Defendant Won:
Insufficient reasons provided in the supporting affidavit.
Insufficient reasons provided in the supporting affidavit.
Supporting Evidence
However, the reason why steps were not taken in the RP within the prescribed time has not been mentioned.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the petition is dismissed. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- A. Shefiyulla
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M. Naseer
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nisar
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nazarudheen
- Relation
- Manager
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- SBT
- Relation
- represented by Chief Manager
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Recovery Tahsildar
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B.L.Prasanth
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Restoration of RP 5/24
Evidence:
No sufficient reason have been stated in the affidavit to restore RP 5/24.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between A. Shefiyulla vs M. Naseer et al regarding restoration of suit
Case Code Year
Case between A. Shefiyulla vs M. Naseer et al regarding restoration of suit