Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 789/2020

Case between Sarojini Amma vs Madhusoodanan Pillai et al regarding Declaration, Partition and Injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-12-08
Duration
Case Code No.
789
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the plaintiff Sarojini Amma who is seeking a declaration, partition, and injunction against the defendants including Madhusoodanan Pillai and others. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff remained absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and the lack of an affidavit filed by her.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and the lack of an affidavit filed by her.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear in court and did not file an affidavit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear in court and did not file an affidavit.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff remained absent and no affidavit filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed for default with costs of the defendants.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sarojini Amma
Party Age
78
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Madhusoodanan Pillai
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Syamala
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thulaseedharan Pillai
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Village Officer, Perinad Village, Kollam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Tahasildar, Taluk Office, Kollam
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.Aboobecker Kutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.Somasekharan Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.R.Prasanth
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R.Sethunathan Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default with costs of the defendants.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default with costs of the defendants.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default with costs of the defendants.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default with costs of the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Declaration
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam District
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Hilari Zacharia et al vs St. Thomas Church et al regarding restoration of suit and condonation of delay.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between SaraswathyAmma et al vs Kattil Nagarukavu Bhadra Bhagavathy Kudumbashethra Trust et al regarding Cancellation of Trust Deed and Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Salman Faris vs The South Indian Bank Ltd et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s.A.R.Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s.Venkateshwar Enterprises et al regarding Realisation of Money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s.A.R. Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s.R.J.Enterprises regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won