Similar Cases
Based on: FDA 2500/2019 — Case between Mathew T Joseph vs Joseph T Joseph et al regarding Final Decree
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
FDA 6/2021
Case between Sreekala K. vs Sreerenjini R et al regarding Final decree.
This case involves Sreekala K. as the petitioner and multiple respondents including Sreerenjini R and others. The court has passed a final decree in this matter.
Final decree
Plaintiff Won
FDA No. 10/2023 in O.S No. 321/2020
Case between Dan Varghese vs Giji Zacharia et al regarding final decree for partition of property
Dan Varghese filed a petition for a final decree in a partition case concerning property shares. The court heard the petition and made the necessary orders regarding the division of the property.
Final Decree
Plaintiff Won
FDA 303684/2018
Case between Sajan K.C et al vs Daniel K.P et al regarding Final decree
The petitioners Sajan K.C, John K.C, Peter K.C, Baby P.P, and Surendran are involved against the respondents Daniel K.P, Saji K.C, and Joy. The case pertains to the passing of a final decree.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
FDA 04/2023
Case between Annamma Andrews et al vs Abraham Thomas et al regarding partition.
The petitioners are Annamma Andrews (deceased) and her legal representatives. The respondents are Abraham Thomas (deceased) and others regarding a petition for partition that was found unnecessary as the parties had already reached an agreement.
Partition
FDA 300009/2024
Case between Mini et al vs Sarojini et al regarding dismissal of petition
Mini, Beena, and Bindhu are the petitioners, while Sarojini and Ullas K.T. are the respondents. The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the petitioners.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Final Decree No. 14/2024
Case between Adarsh vs Vijaya Kamalam et al regarding final decree application
Adarsh is the petitioner in this final decree application against Vijaya Kamalam and Athira. The plaintiff was absent, and the petition was dismissed for default.
Final Decree
Defendant Won
Restoration Petitiion 2854/2019
Case between P C Cherian et al vs T A Kurian et al regarding Restoration of Petition.
The case involves petitioners P C Cherian and Saramma Cheriyan seeking restoration of their petition against respondents T A Kurian and Grac. The petition was dismissed due to lack of medical evidence for the petitioner's claims.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
Restoration Petitiion 2856/2019
Case between P C Cherian et al vs T A Kurian et al regarding dismissal of restoration petition
The case involves a restoration petition filed by P C Cherian and others against T A Kurian and Gracy. The petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's failure to provide medical evidence for his illness.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
Restoration Petitiion 137/2024
Case between Elsamma Thomas vs Jomy Scaria et al regarding Restoration Petition
Elsamma Thomas filed a restoration petition against Jomy Scaria and others. The case was heard and decided on the same day.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 183/2022
Case between Surendran. T.U vs State of Kerala et al regarding default dismissal of suit
Surendran. T.U is the plaintiff in this case against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not represented in court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
E.P. No.23/2020
Case between Balakrishan V vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Balakrishan V is the decree holder and Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd along with its director and his spouse are judgment debtors in this execution petition. The court considered the petition and closed it due to the decree holder's absence.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
E.P.24/2020 in OS No. 248/2018
Case between Rajeevan N vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Execution Petition
Rajeevan N is the decree holder and Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. along with its directors are the judgment debtors. This execution petition was considered by the court and subsequently closed due to non-representation by the decree holder.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 25/2020
Case between Reshmitha M vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Reshmitha M is the petitioner seeking execution of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The court found the decree holder absent and closed the execution petition.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 48/2021
Case between Chandrasekharan P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition.
Chandrasekharan P is the petitioner seeking execution against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The execution petition was heard and closed due to the decree holder not being represented.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 49/2021
Case between Chandrasekharan P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Chandrasekharan P is the petitioner and decree holder in an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and others. The court ordered the closure of the execution petition due to the decree holder not being represented and defects not being cured.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 50/2021
Case between Renuka P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition
Renuka P is the decree holder in this execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The petition was closed as the decree holder was not represented and the defect was not cured.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 53/2021
Case between Ramesh Kumar vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition.
Ramesh Kumar is the petitioner seeking execution of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The petition was heard and the court closed the execution petition due to the decree holder not being represented.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 54/2021
Case between O P Vijayan vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
The case involves O P Vijayan as the petitioner who is seeking execution of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The court closed the execution petition due to the absence of representation from the decree holder.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 55/2021
Case between Hilda Fernandez @ Hilda Lawrence vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition
Hilda Fernandez is the petitioner seeking execution of the decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its director K.N. Rajeev. The execution petition was closed due to the decree holder not being represented and the defect not being cured.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 56/2021
Case between Kalyani C vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition
Kalyani C is the petitioner seeking enforcement of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and other respondents. The court ruled that the decree holder was not represented and closed the execution petition due to lack of action.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 57/2021
Case between Pushpa P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition
This case involves an execution petition filed by Pushpa P against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The decree holder was not represented in court during the hearing.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 65/2021
Case between Vijayalakshmi P K vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Vijayalakshmi P K is the decree holder and has filed an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The court closed the execution petition as the decree holder was not represented and no steps were taken.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
E.P.66/2021
Case between Meenakshi Amma vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding execution petition
The case involves Meenakshi Amma as the petitioner and Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. along with other defendants. The petition was for the execution of a decree.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 67/2020
Case between Rajila V vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition.
Rajila V, represented by Chandrasekharan P, filed an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The decree holder was absent during the hearing.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 67/2021
Case between Chithra Sreedharan vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Chithra Sreedharan is the decree holder seeking execution against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The case revolves around the enforcement of a decree in the execution petition.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 69/2020
Case between Raghavan Adoor vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Raghavan Adoor filed an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and others. The court closed the execution petition due to the decree holder not being represented.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 96/2020
Case between Balakrishnan V vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Execution Petition
Balakrishnan V filed an Execution Petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. and its directors. The case was about the enforcement of a decree, but the decree holder was not represented in court.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 97/2020
Case between Geetha Ravindran vs Sigs Financial Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Execution Petition
Geetha Ravindran, the decree holder, filed an execution petition against Sigs Financial Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. and its directors. The court concluded the hearing on January 4, 2025, without representation from the petitioner.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP 99/2020
Case between Chandrashekharan P vs K N Rajeev et al regarding Execution Petition
Chandrashekharan P is the decree holder in this execution petition against K N Rajeev and others. The case involves the execution of a judgment, but the decree holder was not represented in court.
Execution Petition
Dismissed
EP No. 100/2020
Case between Vattakandy Sreedharan vs Sigs Financial Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Execution Petition
Vattakandy Sreedharan is the petitioner seeking execution of a decree. The respondents include Sigs Financial Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. and other directors.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP 103/2020
Case between O P Vijayakumar vs K N Rajeev et al regarding decree execution.
The case involves O P Vijayakumar as the decree holder and K N Rajeev along with others as judgment debtors. The decree holder was not represented, and it appears that necessary steps were not taken, leading to the closure of the execution petition.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP 300124/2024
Case between M/s Trinity Traders vs Mehaboob regarding settlement of a matter.
This case involves M/s Trinity Traders represented by Joseph Varghese and Mehaboob. The matter is settled with both parties signing a memorandum of agreement.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.126/2019
Case between N.M.Sivarajan vs George Varghese @ Georgekutty, Anil Varghese, Aliyamma regarding compromise petition.
N.M.Sivarajan filed a suit against George Varghese, Anil Varghese, and Aliyamma. The parties involved reached a compromise and the suit was disposed of accordingly.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.449/2014
Case between N.A.George et al vs T.C. Ipe et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiffs, N.A.George and Sreedharan Kunjukunju, are seeking a declaration of their right to a public road and an injunction against the defendants, T.C. Ipe, Vineeth Ipe, and Ammukutty Korulla, who have allegedly obstructed access to the road. The case revolves around property and road ownership disputes.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 824/2015
Case between Abraham Philipose et al vs John Mathyas et al regarding injunction and fixation of boundary
The plaintiffs, Abraham Philipose and Mariyamma Abraham, are seeking an injunction against the defendants, John Mathyas, George Mathyas, and Jerin Mathyas, who are obstructing their use of a road. The case involves disputes over property boundary and easement rights.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 300058/2024
Case between Suma S. vs Ashy Mathew regarding execution proceedings.
Suma S. is the decree holder against Ashy Mathew, the judgment debtor, in execution proceedings. The court order notes the absence of the decree holder's representation and states that no steps were taken, leading to the closure of the execution proceedings.
Execution Proceedings
Defendant Won
E.P.137/2023
Case between Saji T Kurian vs James Abraham regarding Execution Petition
The case involves decree holders Saji T Kurian and Aniyamma Saji seeking execution of a decree against judgment debtor James Abraham. The execution petition was considered on 31st January 2025.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
ST 27/2022
Case between K S nandakumar vs Ratheesh Rajamani regarding Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
K S nandakumar is the complainant and Ratheesh Rajamani is the accused in this case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court has decided to acquit the accused.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST 52/2022
Case between Suresh P G vs Sajimon P K regarding withdrawal of complaint
Suresh P G filed a petition to withdraw the complaint against Sajimon P K. The court granted permission and acquitted the accused.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
ST 300179/2020
Case between G Harinarayanan vs Raju R regarding withdrawal of complaint
G Harinarayanan, the complainant, filed a petition to withdraw the complaint after the entire amount was paid. The court granted permission for the withdrawal, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
EP 300088/2024
Case between Nattakom Service Co-Operative Bank et al vs Roy V.J. et al regarding Decree
Nattakom Service Co-Operative Bank is the decree holder represented by Secretary, P. Sheeba. The judgment debtors include Roy V.J., Anishkumar M.S., and Sindhu Roy.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Restoration Petitiion 111/2024
Case between Dilip K John vs Naisy regarding Restoration Petition
The case involves a restoration petition filed by Dilip K John and Anila John against Naisy. The court concluded the proceedings on January 29, 2025.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 298/2015
Case between B. Santha Kumari Amma et al vs Mohana Das et al regarding dismissal of suit
The case involves plaintiffs B. Santha Kumari Amma and Girish Kumar against defendants Mohana Das, Prasanna Kumari @ Prasanna Raghunath, M.C. Saroja (Sarojini), Sheela (Sheela.S.Nair), Leena, and N.S.S Branch No. 158 Karuyogam. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
E.P. No.105/2023
Case between K K Madhavan vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
K K Madhavan is the decree holder seeking execution against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and other defendants. The court found that the decree holder has not taken steps necessary for the proceedings.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
ST 81/2021
Case between K K Thomas vs Anish T C regarding Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
K K Thomas filed a complaint against Anish T C under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed a petition to withdraw the complaint, which was granted by the court.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
Restoration Petitiion 180/2024
Case between Biju K Mathew vs Sigtech Marketing Private Limited et al regarding restoration petition
Biju K Mathew is the petitioner seeking restoration of a petition. The respondents include Sigtech Marketing Private Limited and Vrinda Rajesh.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.354/2023
Case between Ambika Raju vs Chacko @ Joy, Mathew regarding suit for default
The plaintiff, Ambika Raju, was involved in a case against defendants Chacko @ Joy and Mathew. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and not represented in court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 300141/2023
Case between Kaippuzha Service Co Operative Bank Ltd No 3793 et al vs Satheesan P P regarding Execution Proceedings
Kaippuzha Service Co Operative Bank Ltd No 3793 is the decree holder represented by Secretary Manju K S, and Satheesan P P is the judgment debtor. The case involves execution proceedings on a decree.
Execution Proceedings
Defendant Won