Case Summary
Mini, Beena, and Bindhu are the petitioners, while Sarojini and Ullas K.T. are the respondents. The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the petitioners.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed as the petitioners did not appear in court.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioners were not represented in the last posting.
The petitioners were not represented in the last posting.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioners were not represented in the last posting.
The petitioners were not represented in the last posting.
Supporting Evidence
petitioners in the last posting also. Petitioners called absent.
Judgment Evidence:
Petition is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mini
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Beena
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bindhu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sarojini
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ullas K.T.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition is dismissed.
Evidence:
Petition is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
FDA
Case Code Year
2024