Case Summary
Surendran. T.U is the plaintiff in this case against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not represented in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and not represented.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Surendran. T.U
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- State of Kerala
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Deputy Tahasildar (Revenue Recovery)
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Village Officer
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Branch Manager, Bank of Baroda
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T.N. Prakash
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P. Vinodji
- Appearance Type
- Government Pleader
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Surendran. T.U vs State of Kerala et al regarding default dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Surendran. T.U vs State of Kerala et al regarding default dismissal of suit