Similar Cases
Based on: OS NO. 114/ 2018 — Case between Abdhulkalam vs Pallickal Grama panachayath et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS NO. 113/ 2018
Case between Shibily vs Pallickal Grama panachayath et al regarding acceptance of witness schedule.
Shibily is the plaintiff seeking to declare a notice as null and void while also requesting to accept a witness schedule for examining the Panchayath Secretary. The defendants argue that the petition is barred by limitation and that the documents are not available.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 107/2018
Case between Chandrahasan et al vs The Secretary, Kadakkavoor Grama Panchayath et al regarding dismissal for default.
The case involves multiple plaintiffs led by Chandrahasan against the Kadakkavoor Grama Panchayath and its committee members. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 922/2021
Case between Lalithamma Radhakrishna Menon vs Cheranellor Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Lalithamma Radhakrishna Menon and her daughter Smitha Radhakrishna Menon, are seeking permanent prohibitory injunction against the Cheranellor Grama Panchayath, claiming that the Grama Panchayath has no authority to maintain a pathway they co-own. The Grama Panchayath contends that the pathway is public and they have the right to maintain it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1783/2022
Case between M.G. Siva prasad vs Secretary, Chenkal Grama Panchayath et al regarding Balance Court Fee
M.G. Siva prasad filed a suit against the Secretary of Chenkal Grama Panchayath and others regarding the remittance of balance court fees. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the rejection of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.432/2020
Case between Athira vs Vilavoorkkal Grama Panchayat et al regarding dismissal of suit
Athira, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Vilavoorkkal Grama Panchayat and its officials. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.100/2023
Case between Shaji Sreedharan vs Niyas Shukkoor et al regarding eviction and arrears of rent.
Shaji Sreedharan is the plaintiff seeking eviction of the defendants from a shop room and recovery of arrears of rent. The defendants, Niyas Shukkoor and Noushad, have failed to pay rent since the tenancy was terminated.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 172/2021
Case between Subash vs Nalini regarding eviction and damages.
Subash and Anil, brothers and plaintiffs, are seeking to evict the defendant Nalini from a shop room and recover damages for unpaid rent. The defendant has failed to vacate despite the expiry of the rental agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.472/2018
Case between P.C. Samuel vs S. Xavier regarding arrears of rent and damages
P.C. Samuel, the plaintiff, rented out a building to S. Xavier, the defendant, for running a hotel. The plaintiff claimed arrears of rent and damages due to the defendant's non-payment and alleged damage to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1247/2022
Case between Sunil Kupperi vs Leela regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
Sunil Kupperi is the plaintiff claiming ownership of a property while Leela, the defendant, was a maid in the household. Sunil is seeking an order to vacate the premises as Leela has failed to leave despite requests.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 90/2022
Case between Ayyappan vs Ivin Prabhu et al regarding eviction from property
Ayyappan, the petitioner, claims to be the statutory tenant of a property he uses for his scrap business. The defendants assert they purchased the property at auction and are seeking to evict him.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.776/2020
Case between The Kerala State Federation of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Development Co-operatives Limited vs Radhika Devi. A.L regarding eviction and recovery of arrears of rent.
The Kerala State Federation of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Development Co-operatives Limited filed a suit against Radhika Devi. A.L for eviction and recovery of rent arrears. The defendant was accused of failing to pay the increased rent and execute a new rent deed after the agreement expired in 2017.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1900/2022
Case between Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devaswom et al vs Abdul Rahim@ S. Rahim regarding realization of money.
The plaintiff, a Devaswom, seeks to recover dues from the defendant, a businessman, for unpaid rent. The defendant has remained in the premises beyond the agreed lease term without paying the necessary increased rent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1428/2024
Case between K.B. Ajikumar vs Prem Rishikumaran regarding unlawful eviction
K.B. Ajikumar, the plaintiff, seeks to prevent Prem Rishikumaran, the defendant, from unlawfully evicting him from the rented building where he operates his office. The dispute arises from alleged rental arrears and the conditions surrounding a rent agreement.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.884/2020
Case between The Kerala State Fedaration of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes Development Co-operative Ltd No.4351 vs A.S Girish regarding eviction and recovery of arrears of rent
The Kerala State Federation of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Development Co-operative Ltd filed a suit against A.S Girish for eviction and recovery of arrears of rent due to non-payment. The defendant did not appear in court, leading to the case being heard ex-parte.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 458/2023
Case between Azeem Aboobaker Sait vs Leelakumari regarding arrears of rent and eviction
Azeem Aboobaker Sait, represented by his power of attorney holder Ashokan K, filed a petition against Leelakumari for eviction and recovery of arrears of rent. The respondent has not paid the rent due since January 2022, leading to the suit seeking a direction for deposit of the owed amount.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
R.C.P.No.36/2025
Case between Padma Sadasivan vs Soumya Chakkungal Simon regarding eviction and arrears of rent
Padma Sadasivan filed a petition against Soumya Chakkungal Simon for eviction due to non-payment of rent amounting to Rs.6,60,000. The court found that the counter petitioner defaulted in rent payment after September 2022 and allowed the eviction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.309/2025
Case between Aswathy Razak M vs Habsiba regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Aswathy Razak M and Baby Latha Razak, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Habsiba and Samuel Dev. The case revolves around the eviction attempts by the defendants and obstruction of water facilities in the rented properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.743/2025
Case between Asha.S. et al vs Asokan.G et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves a dispute between the plaintiffs, Asha.S and Ajithkumar, and the defendants, Asokan.G and others, concerning a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiffs are seeking to restrain the defendants from trespassing on their properties and obstructing their access to a pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1606/2024
Case between Maheen Abubacker vs D.Ambika Devi et al regarding eviction and rent agreement dispute.
The case involves Maheen Abubacker, the plaintiff, who entered a rent agreement with the defendants for a business property but is facing eviction. The defendants claim the plaintiff has not paid the agreed rent and is occupying the premises illegally.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
R.C.P.No.78/2024
Case between RS Krishna Jyothi vs Sibi Augustin regarding eviction and non-payment of rent.
The petitioner, RS Krishna Jyothi, seeks eviction of the respondent, Sibi Augustin, for non-payment of rent. The respondent failed to pay rent and did not respond to the legal notice demanding payment or vacating the premises.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1951/2019
Case between University of Kerala vs The Managing Director, Kerala State Co-operative Federation for Fisherman Development Limited regarding mandatory injunction
The University of Kerala sought a mandatory injunction against the defendant, the Managing Director of Matsyafed, for vacating a stall on university property. The plaintiff claimed the defendant occupied the stall unlawfully after the expiry of their license agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.877/2017
Case between Mohanan.B vs James Fletcher regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Mohanan.B and his wife Amutha.P, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, James Fletcher, who attempted to evict them from a tea stall they have operated for years. The plaintiffs claim they have a lawful tenancy and have been paying rent regularly.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.907/2020
Case between R. Aravind vs Shaini Vijay regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
R. Aravind, a tenant, is involved in a suit against his landlord, Shaini Vijay, over the wrongful demand for eviction from a rented shop room. The plaintiff claims that the defendant is making illegal demands and threatening eviction despite the plaintiff having no rent arrears.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1241/2022
Case between Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple vs R.Sukumaran Nair regarding mandatory injunction and recovery of possession
The plaintiff, Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple, is seeking a mandatory injunction to evict the defendant, R.Sukumaran Nair, from a shop room. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has occupied the shop without legal permission after the lease was terminated.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1194/2025
Case between Venugopalan Nair K. vs A.M. Shanavas et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Venugopalan Nair K. filed a suit against A.M. Shanavas and others for a temporary prohibitory injunction to prevent them from trespassing on his property. The defendants are tenants of the plaintiff and have been accused of misusing the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.147/2023
Case between Mohammed Sali vs Mammen Solomon regarding striking off pleadings and injunction.
Mohammed Sali and Mammen Solomon are involved in a case where the plaintiff, Mohammed Sali, failed to comply with a court order regarding the deposit of rent arrears. As a result, the court has dismissed the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.259/2019
Case between M/s. Spencer’s Travel Services Limited et al vs George Mathew et al regarding forceful eviction
The plaintiffs, M/s. Spencer’s Travel Services Limited and Geetha George, filed a suit against the defendants George Mathew and Mathew Fernandez for forceful eviction. The court determined that the suit was infructuous as the defendant had already obtained possession of the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 268 OF 2016
Case between Ismail et al vs G. Surendran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves plaintiffs Ismail, Najmudheen, Kunhalavi Haji, and Anwar Sadath suing defendants G. Surendran, Abdul Salm, Abdul Gafoor, and Sekkeena for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiffs were absent during the proceedings, leading to the case being dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O. S. No.427/2017
Case between Rev. Fr. K George Jacob vs Vengola Grama Panchayath regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
Rev. Fr. K George Jacob filed a suit against Vengola Grama Panchayath for a mandatory and permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff alleges that the Panchayath obstructed the natural flow of rainwater, causing flooding in his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 314/2021
Case between Mohammed Faisal et al vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs Mohammed Faisal and his wife Shejinamol seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath to prevent construction obstructing their access to a public road. Plaintiffs claim ownership and access rights to their property, while the Panchayath argues it holds valid authority to construct an Anganvadi on the disputed land.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 300 /2019
Case between Mr. John Peter vs Edakkattuvayal Grama Panchayat et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Mr. John Peter filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against Edakkattuvayal Grama Panchayat and others. The matter was settled in mediation, and the terms were accepted by the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No. 314 /2021
Case between Mohammed Faisal vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding interim injunction
The case involves petitioners Mohammed Faisal and Shejinamol seeking an interim injunction against the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath to prevent construction on the northern side of their property. The court found the petition barred by res judicata as a similar matter had previously been decided.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No. 314 /2 021
Case between Mohammed Faisal et al vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding approved building plan
The petitioners, Mohammed Faisal and Shejinamol, are seeking relief concerning the construction of a building. The respondent is the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 08 / 2024
Case between Shaji Varghese et al vs Thiruvaniyoor Grama Panchayat et al regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Shaji Varghese and Baby, seek a temporary injunction against the defendants, which include Thiruvaniyoor Grama Panchayat and Ajimon.K.M, to prevent them from trespassing on their property and demolishing a compound wall. The dispute centers on the ownership and boundaries of several plots of land.
Civil Suit
O.S.No.51/2022
Case between Sreethu P N vs George P M et al regarding temporary injunction for use of a road.
Sreethu P N filed a petition seeking a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from blocking a local road that has been in use for 50 years. The defendants are accused of obstructing access to the road, affecting the plaintiff's ability to reach their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 344/2011
Case between Saji Hussain et al vs Edava Special Grade Panchayath et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Saji Hussain and Hussain are the plaintiffs, while Edava Special Grade Panchayath and additional defendants include state authorities. The case involves a suit that was dismissed based on a not pressed memo filed by the plaintiffs.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.20/2023
Case between Niravu Farmers Producer Company Ltd vs The Chathamangalam Grama Panchayath regarding realization of an amount due
Niravu Farmers Producer Company Ltd is the plaintiff seeking to recover an amount due from The Chathamangalam Grama Panchayath, the defendant. The case involved a claim presented under the Code of Civil Procedure.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.462/2021
Case between Kadeeja vs Kunnamagalam Grama Panchayath regarding mandatory injunction
Kadeeja is the plaintiff claiming ownership over a property that the Kunnamagalam Grama Panchayath has converted into a public road. The plaintiff seeks an injunction to remove the construction on her property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 509/2018
Case between Indira vs Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath regarding suit dismissal for default
Indira, the plaintiff, was involved in a suit against Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath, the defendant. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 510/2018
Case between Kelan vs Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath regarding dismissal for default.
Kelan, the plaintiff, is involved in a suit against Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath, the defendant. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the case for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 511/2018
Case between Indira vs Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath regarding dismissal for default
Indira filed a lawsuit against Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 354/2021
Case between Mini vs Puzhakkara Nabeesa et al regarding Mandatory and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff, Mini, is the owner of a property and seeks to remove obstructions put up by the defendants, Puzhakkara Nabeesa and Subair, to access her property. The case revolves around the existence of a public pathway that has been obstructed by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 19/2018
Case between JASHILNADH. R vs VADAKKAYIL PATHU et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and declaration
Jashilnadh. R is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against VADAKKAYIL PATHU and others, who are accused of attempting to unlawfully construct a retaining wall affecting the plaintiff's property rights. The case centers on the right of way to the plaint A schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP/85/2025
Case between Purameri Panchayath vanitha Co operative Society Ltd vs Ratheesh P K et al regarding execution of decree
The petitioner is Purameri Panchayath vanitha Co operative Society Ltd, and the respondent includes Ratheesh P K and others. The case involves the execution of a decree for payment of a debt, with the respondent expressing willingness to repay.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 120/2024
Case between Kunhabdulla vs Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
This case involves Kunhabdulla, the plaintiff, who is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali, to prevent them from trespassing onto his property for a road widening project. The defendants allegedly entered the property without consent and marked sections they claimed were necessary for the road work.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 122/2024
Case between RAKHI @ RAGISHA vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Rakhi @ Ragisha and Kamala, seek a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali and others, who are alleged to have trespassed into their property to mark for road widening without consent. The plaintiffs contest the defendants' claims of rights over their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 124/2024
Case between SURESH vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs SURESH and RAHNA seeking a permanent injunction against defendants VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI, AKHILA MARIYAT, C. K. NAZAR, K. T. K CHANDRAN, NADAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, and URALUNGAL LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. to restrain them from trespassing and committing acts of waste on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.754/2019
Case between Thomas @ Baby et al vs Secretary regarding declaration and injunction.
The plaintiffs, Thomas @ Baby and Mathew, claim to be the absolute owners of properties and are contesting the defendant's action of measuring their private road without legal right. The suit seeks to declare the road as private property and prevent the defendant from taking further action.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won