| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 4331 - 4335 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between UCO Bank vs M/s D Mark Studio & Vedeos et al regarding realization of money

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 46 OF 2019

Tirur

2019-09-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ramanalukkal Abdul Shareef vs Ramanalukkal Sidhikh regarding specific performance of contract.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 56 OF 2019

Tirur Taluk

2019-09-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Vijaya Bank et al vs Jithesh.V.P. regarding realization of money

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 262 OF 2018

Tirur

2019-09-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vijaya Bank, Rep. By its Branch Manager vs Sumithra.T.P., Kurian Mathew regarding realization of money.

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 302 OF 2018

2019-09-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Haneefa vs Mammu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 393 OF 2005

Tirur

2019-09-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

23%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed due to non-payment of necessary fees for pursuing their cases.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Absence of Evidence

Plaintiffs failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims or demonstrate financial means.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not taking necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation of Petitioners

Dismissing cases often occurred due to petitioners not being present or represented in court.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Evidence

Failure to Take Steps

Non-Representation of Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?