Case Summary
The case involves Ramanalukkal Abdul Shareef as the plaintiff and Ramanalukkal Sidhikh as the defendant. The plaintiff sought specific performance of a contract, but the suit was dismissed due to non-payment of court fees.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the required court fees.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is one for specific performance of contract. No Balance Court fee paid. Plaint rejected u/o VII Rule 11.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ramanalukkal Abdul Shareef
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ramanalukkal Sidhikh
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
None mentioned.
Defendants Documents
None mentioned.
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.K.Abdul Naseem
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Shoukkath Babu.R.K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected due to non-payment of court fee.
Evidence:
No Balance Court fee paid. Plaint rejected u/o VII Rule 11.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ramanalukkal Abdul Shareef vs Ramanalukkal Sidhikh regarding specific performance of contract.
Case Code Year
Case between Ramanalukkal Abdul Shareef vs Ramanalukkal Sidhikh regarding specific performance of contract.