| Niyamam AI

Displaying 4081 - 4085 of 22086

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between P.K Rajamma et al vs V.A Subrahmonyan et al regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1560 /2014

Ernakulam

2024-09-10

approximately-10 years 2 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Joseph Martin vs Sreejith N U regarding Rent Control proceedings

Rent Control

R.C.P. No. 135/2023

Ernakulam

2026-01-15

approximately-1 year 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. CONPAC MIX PVT. LTD vs Aleyamma Varghese regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 249/2024

2024-09-11

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s Studio New Order et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1335 /2022

Ernakulam

2024-09-12

approximately-3 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K P Babu vs Geetha @ Seetha et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1361/2018

Ernakulam

2024-09-13

approximately-6 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9737

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

26%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Multiple cases were dismissed due to failures in paying required court fees or batta for processing petitions.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs frequently failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or establish financial capacity of respondents.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioning Parties

Dismissals occurred when petitioners failed to appear in court for hearings and proceedings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Petitions were often dismissed because plaintiffs did not follow required legal procedures, such as issuing notices.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioning Parties

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?