Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 249/2024

Case between M/s. CONPAC MIX PVT. LTD vs Aleyamma Varghese regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-09-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. CONPAC MIX PVT. LTD is seeking payment from Aleyamma Varghese for an amount due from multiple transactions. The defendant failed to pay despite repeated demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, concluding that the defendant owes a sum of ₹52,246. A decree was issued to recover this amount along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
An amount of ₹52,246 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, concluding that the defendant owes a sum of ₹52,246. A decree was issued to recover this amount along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved their claim through uncontested evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved their claim through uncontested evidence.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of the PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 52,246/- (Rupees fifty two thousand and two hundred and forty six only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. CONPAC MIX PVT. LTD
Relation
represented by its Managing Director C.V. Anandan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aleyamma Varghese
Party Age
52
Relation
Proprietrix
Plaintiffs Documents
Invoices dated 07.06.2023, 10.08.2023 and 22.08.2023, Certified copy of the Ledger Account Statement, Copy of Lawyer Notice.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V. K Balachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amrutha P. S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay the plaintiff an amount of 52,246/- with interest.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 52,246/- (Rupees fifty two thousand and two hundred and forty six only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or her assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice for building material purchased by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice for building material purchased by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice for building material purchased by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice for building material purchased by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Certified copy of the Ledger Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides a summary of the transactions between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to defendant regarding the unpaid amount.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Returned Postal cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of communication sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s. CONPAC MIX PVT. LTD vs Aleyamma Varghese regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. CONPAC MIX PVT. LTD vs Aleyamma Varghese regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Navas A.A et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nikhil.N. Asher vs Plymart et al regarding suit for realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Space International Air Travels (P) Ltd. vs Tapovan Impex Private Limited regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Ambatt Electricals regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Kureekode Agencies regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won