Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 3866 - 3870 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Pathiyil Aboobacker vs Nellikkal Muhammedali regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 179/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-06-23

0 years, 5 months, 22 days

Partial

View Full Details

Case between Chittakath Karthuveettil Ayisakutty et al vs Kottayil Kunhipocker et al regarding cost payment

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 278/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-06-23

0 years, 5 months, 19 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Muhammedali vs Pathiyil Aboobacker regarding civil decree

Civil Suit

EP 26/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-06-23

0 years, 5 months, 22 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd vs Harif Chomayil et al regarding petition dismissal

Civil Suit

EP 422/2012

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-06-23

1 year, 7 months, 16 days

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. vs Harif Chomayil et al regarding debt repayment

Execution Proceedings

EP 423/2012

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-06-23

1 year, 7 months, 16 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Many petitions were dismissed for default as plaintiffs failed to pay the required batta fees.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence regarding the means of payment by respondents.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken by Plaintiffs

Multiple cases were dismissed because the plaintiffs did not take necessary actions to progress their petitions.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff in Court

Some petitions were dismissed simply due to the absence of the plaintiffs during court hearings.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken by Plaintiffs

Absence of the Plaintiff in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?