Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 32/2023

Case between Lawrence Alex vs B.Reghunath regarding eviction of tenant

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-12-21
Duration
approximately-1 year 9 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Lawrence Alex, the landlord, filed a petition against his tenant, B.Reghunath, a Chartered Accountant, seeking eviction due to non-payment of rent and bonafide need for the premises. The tenant disputes the eviction, claiming a long-standing tenancy and financial difficulties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the eviction of B.Reghunath from the petition schedule building based on the landlord's bonafide need and the tenant's inability to settle dues.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent within 30 days
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the landlord's need for the premises to be genuine and bonafide.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed in part as follows; (I) The eviction sought under Section 11(3) of the Act is allowed, and the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Lawrence Alex (44 years years) Kaloor Veettil, Kaloor Desom, Ernakulam village, Kochi 682 017

Defendants

B.Reghunath (69 years years) Neytheli Nagar, Kakkanad P.O., Ernalulam, Kerala, Pin 682 030

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner prayed for eviction of the respondent from the tenanted premises.
Evidence:
The eviction sought under Section 11(3) of the Act is allowed, and the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served to the respondent demanding payment of arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: A/d Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of delivery of the lawyer's notice to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Returned Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the lawyer's notice was returned unclaimed.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Document reports on the availability of vacant premises.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 03/09/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases