| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3761 - 3765 of 21948

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Greeshma Devi vs Sudha Devi, Kristhudas regarding partition

Civil Suit

OS No. 05/2022

2024-02-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vargheese and Mary vs Johnson et al regarding civil suit

Civil Suit

OS. No. 41/2016

2024-02-28

approximately-7 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Seetharaman Embranthiri vs Johnson K A regarding temporary injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1247 /2024

2024-12-02

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Golden Plaza Owners Association et al vs C Najeeb et al regarding declaration and injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No.7 08/2012

Ernakulam

2024-12-02

approximately-12 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Anooja P. A vs Jerry James et al regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 739/2021

ERNAKULAM

2024-12-02

approximately-4 years 3 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9670

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required batta, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Provide Evidence

Lack of evidence to demonstrate the means of the respondents resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Several petitions were dismissed due to the petitioners' failure to attend court hearings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken by Petitioners

Dismissing cases occurred when petitioners failed to take necessary procedural steps.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Failure to Provide Evidence

Absence of Petitioners in Court

No Steps Taken by Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?