Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 2836 - 2840 of 3158

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Muneerudheen. P. vs Hamza Master regarding dishonour of cheque (Section 138 of N.I. Act)

Criminal Case - Dishonour of Cheque (Section 138 of N.I. Act)

S.T. No: 27/2014 (Refiled from ST.347/2013 of J.F.C.M-1, Tirur)

Tirur

2014-07-24

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Nizar Ahammed et al regarding debt recovery

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

EP 76/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-07-23

0 years, 4 months, 27 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Nafeesu vs Thappiyil Musthafa and Pathummol regarding settlement

Civil Suit

OS 513/2013

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-07-22

0 years, 7 months, 2 days

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Secretary-In Charge vs Shoukkathali Madathil Parambil et al regarding debt recovery

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

EP 20/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-07-22

0 years, 7 months, 1 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kunnamkulam Financing Company Ltd. vs Rajesh regarding money decree

Money Decree Case

EP 398/2012

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-07-22

1 year, 8 months, 28 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,158 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 15%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 73 cases)
Commission Report (in 69 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 60 cases)
Tax receipt (in 51 cases)
Agreement (in 43 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1598
Defendant Won: 1074

1074

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

29%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required litigation fees known as batta, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence

Many petitions were dismissed due to insufficient evidence to support claims or prove necessary financial means.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Notice

Dismissing cases occurred when plaintiffs failed to issue necessary notices to respondents, preventing proper proceedings.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Non-Presentation of Documents

Several cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not providing required documents, crucial for supporting their petitions.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence

Failure to Issue Notice

Non-Presentation of Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?