| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2821 - 2825 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Pradeep. R et al regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

OS.No.95/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-12-17

approximately-9 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Soumya.S.S et al vs Sreekumari et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit

OS.No.2114/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-12-17

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Prasad Kumar Nair vs Shajna Basheer regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

OS.No.1080/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-12-18

approximately-4 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Dhanesh Babu.B vs P.S. Sajith regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

OS.No.1205/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-12-18

approximately-5 years 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Abhilash.R regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No.271/2015

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-12-18

approximately-14 years 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

31%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required costs, leading to their petitions being dismissed for default.

Found in 31 cases (31%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence regarding the financial means of the respondents was a common reason for case dismissals.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs not taking necessary steps to proceed with their petitions.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Plaintiffs were often absent, which directly contributed to the dismissals of their petitions.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Required Steps

Absence of Petitioners in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?