| Niyamam AI

Displaying 251 - 255 of 21804

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s.Canara Bank vs M/s.Riya Marketing et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 1004/2022

Kollam

2025-07-04

approximately-5 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Krishnakumar vs Rajamma Amma et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 603/2019

Kollam District, Kerala

2025-07-05

approximately-5 years 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Deepthimol.T.S vs Sajila.A et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 669/2023

Kollam

2025-07-05

approximately-2 years 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Rajesh.R.K.Nair vs Aji Chandran regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 1015/2022

Kollam

2025-07-05

approximately-3 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Gracy George vs B.J.Vijayan regarding injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. 461/2023

Kollam District

2025-07-05

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9603

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay the required batta, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissal.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Dismissals occurred due to the plaintiffs' inaction in pursuing case processes.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed because the plaintiffs failed to appear in court.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?