| Niyamam AI

Displaying 19786 - 19790 of 21893

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Muhammed Shibil et al vs Baiju.U.V et al regarding Cheque Dishonour

Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:20/2017

Tirur

2018-03-12

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sayyid Yasir vs Baiju..U.V regarding Cheque Dishonour

Cheque Dishonour - Section 138 N.I. Act

S.T. No:52/2017

Tirur

2018-03-12

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Melethil Kunhumuhammad and Melathil Jamal vs Unknown regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 303026/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-03-09

0 years, 2 months, 24 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ummer vs Majeed.M.K regarding money dispute

Civil Suit - Money Claim

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 82 OF 20 15

Tirur

2018-03-09

2 years 8 months and 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Chatheri Abdurehiman vs Parammal Hussain regarding money.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 415 OF 2014

2019-06-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

31%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required fees for proceeding, resulting in default dismissals.

Found in 31 cases (31%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Many cases were dismissed because the petitioner did not show up in court.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notice

Several dismissals occurred due to the lack of action in issuing required notices to respondents.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Issue Notice

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?