Case Summary
Complainant Sayyid Yasir accused Baiju..U.V of cheque dishonour under section 138 of N.I. Act. The accused pleaded not guilty, and the court found him not guilty.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquittal under section 257 Cr.P.C.
Case Type
Cheque Dishonour - Section 138 N.I. Act
Final Judgment
No
The accused is acquitted under section 257 Cr.P.C. as the matter was settled and hearing 257 application was allowed by the court.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Matter was settled. 257 application is filed. Heard allowed. Hence the accused is acquitted u/s. 257 Cr.P.C.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sayyid Yasir
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Baiju..U.V
- Relation
- Proprietor/Authorised Signatory
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Acquittal
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Acquittal of the defendant under section 257 Cr.P.C.
Evidence:
Matter was settled. 257 application is filed. Heard allowed. Hence the accused is acquitted u/s. 257 Cr.P.C.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Cheque Dishonour - Section 138 N.I. Act
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Sayyid Yasir vs Baiju..U.V regarding Cheque Dishonour
Case Code Year
Case between Sayyid Yasir vs Baiju..U.V regarding Cheque Dishonour
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Out-of-Court Settlement
Nature of Cheque Case