Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1976 - 1980 of 3169

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Kadambil Poozhitharammal lyyathakutty et al vs Ottayil Alayinkanakath Rafeek regarding property delivery

Execution Petition

Execution Petition No. 31 of 2016

Tirur

2016-08-19

18 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kunhipathumma vs Kadeejakutty regarding property delivery

Execution Petition

Execution Petition No. 94 of 2016

Tirur

2016-08-29

Not mentioned

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Neduvancheri Beeran Haji's Son vs Neduvancheri Mammad's Son regarding property delivery

Civil Execution Petition

Execution Petition No. 117 of 2016

Tirur

2016-08-29

Not mentioned

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Naduvancheri Muhammad et al vs Neduvancheri Mammad et al regarding execution of property delivery

Execution Petition

Execution Petition No. 118 of 2016

Tirur

2016-08-29

Not mentioned

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The secretary, Kalpakancheri Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs Vaniyam Parambil Saidali et al regarding execution of decree

Execution Petition

Execution Petition No. 226 of 2015

Tirur

2016-08-29

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

50%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,169 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 15%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 73 cases)
Commission Report (in 69 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 60 cases)
Tax receipt (in 51 cases)
Agreement (in 43 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1600
Defendant Won: 1076

1076

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

31%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default for Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed due to failing to pay required fees for the case progress.

Found in 31 cases (31%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed as plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Plaintiffs frequently failed to take necessary procedural steps, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Dismissals often occurred due to the plaintiffs' physical absence at court hearings.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default for Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken in Case

Absence of the Plaintiff

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?