Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1956 - 1960 of 3197

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sabeerah et al regarding money suit

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

Original Suit No. 242 of 2016

Tirur

2016-10-03

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The secretary, Makkara Paramb Service Co-operative Bank vs Abdul Rasheed Thommangadan et al regarding execution petition

Execution Petition

Execution Petition No. 197 of 2016

Tirur

2016-10-04

Not mentioned

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Athiyattil Pathumma et al vs Mukundan @ Sundaran et al regarding execution of property delivery

Execution Petition

Execution Petition No. 324/2015

Tirur

2016-10-03

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The secretary, Edarikkode Service Co-operative Bank et al vs Arakkal Kunhimuhammad regarding executing decree

Execution Petition

Execution Petition No. 418 of 2015

Tirur

2016-10-03

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Edarikkode Service Co-operative Bank vs Arakkal Kunhimuhammad regarding execution of decree

Execution Petition

Execution Petition No.425 of 2015

Tirur

2016-10-03

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

50%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,197 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 15%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 74 cases)
Commission Report (in 70 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 60 cases)
Tax receipt (in 51 cases)
Agreement (in 43 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1604
Defendant Won: 1077

1077

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary batta fees leading to case dismissal.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Dismissals occurred due to plaintiffs not providing sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Instances where plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to appear in court when required.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken in Case

Absence of the Plaintiff

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?