| Niyamam AI

Displaying 19311 - 19315 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Paul Abraham vs et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP No. 1/2015 in O.S No. 34/2009

2024-06-07

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Pepco No.III.19/A vs P.P.Corporation regarding Transfer of Decree

Execution Petition

EP No. 1/2025 in OS No. 20/2018

Kolenchery

2025-01-17

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Roobiya vs Accomplish Marketing Company Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding realisation of money

Suit for realisation of money

ORIGINAL PETITION (PAUPER) No. 30 OF 2017

2019-11-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Aboobcker et al vs Kuttihassan et al regarding petition under Order IX, Rule 4 of Civil Procedure Code

Civil Procedure Code

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. 673 OF 2018

2019-11-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Parnnangadi Sreenivasan, S/o. Raman vs Edayath Abdul Majeed regarding realization of amount

Civil Procedure Code

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. 1197 OF 2018

2019-11-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to lack of payment of necessary court fees, resulting in petition dismissal.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of evidence regarding defendants' financial capacities led to numerous dismissals.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Many petitions were dismissed due to inaction or failure to follow procedural steps.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation in Court

Dismissing petitions where plaintiffs failed to appear and represent their cases was common.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Non-Representation in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?