Case Summary
Involves a petition to set aside an exparte decree in a suit for amount realization due to defendant's absence on trial date.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Procedure Code
Final Judgment
No
Petitioner's application to set aside exparte decree was granted with imposed cost.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The exparte decree was set aside to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
The exparte decree was set aside to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The exparte decree was set aside to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
The exparte decree was set aside to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner failed to contest the matter despite multiple opportunities, but to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, the exparte decree was set aside.
Judgment Evidence:
The delay of 84 days in preferring the application to set aside the exparte decree is condoned and the exparte decree, dated 15.12.2017 against the petitioner, is set aside on deposit of cost of ₹ 3000/- on or before 30.11.2019.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Parnnangadi Sreenivasan
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Edayath Abdul Majeed
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Procedure Code
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Parnnangadi Sreenivasan, S/o. Raman vs Edayath Abdul Majeed regarding realization of amount
Case Code Year
Case between Parnnangadi Sreenivasan, S/o. Raman vs Edayath Abdul Majeed regarding realization of amount