| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1911 - 1915 of 21901

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Aanthaparambil Mohanan vs Jagadeesan regarding return of advance sale consideration.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 407/2024

Kozhikode

2025-11-25

approximately-2 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mehroof et al vs Sajad regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

R C P No.32/2025

Kozhikode

2025-11-25

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mallika.P.I vs Vimal Sebastian regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.451/2024

Kozhikode

2025-11-26

approximately-1 year 8 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Dipin. P. P regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 168/2025

Kozhikode

2025-11-27

approximately-4 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kammu vs Anitha regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.576/2024

Kozhikode

2025-11-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9647

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

23%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed because they did not pay the necessary court fees or costs, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation in Court

Several cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not showing up in court or not having proper representation.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs frequently failed to present adequate evidence to support their claims, leading to dismissals.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Dismissing cases for lack of proper notice issuance to defendants was a common failure point for plaintiffs.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Representation in Court

Insufficient Evidence Provided

Failure to Issue Required Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?