Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R C P No.32/2025

Case between Mehroof et al vs Sajad regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff-II
Judge
Smt. Anjali. P
Order Date
2025-11-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves petitioners Mehroof and Ahraf seeking to evict the respondent Sajad from a rented room based on the claim of bona fide need for a furniture business. The respondent was set ex parte as he did not appear in court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition filed by the petitioners for eviction, as the evidence provided was insufficient to establish the bona fide need for the rental space.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition filed by the petitioners for eviction, as the evidence provided was insufficient to establish the bona fide need for the rental space.
Key Reasoning:
The evidence presented was deemed insufficient to substantiate the claim of bona fide need.
Why Defendant Won:
The evidence presented was deemed insufficient to substantiate the claim of bona fide need.
Supporting Evidence
Evidence of PW1 and PW2 who are both power of attorney holders are not at all sufficient to establish the bonafide need put up by the landlords.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mehroof
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ahraf
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajad
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Lease agreement dated 01.02.2021
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. A. Jaleel
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Petition to evict the respondent from the petition schedule room
Evidence:
the petition fails and is liable to be dismissed

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed between petitioner and Respondent
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Bonafide requirement of tenant
Case Code
Case between Mehroof et al vs Sajad regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Mehroof et al vs Sajad regarding Rent Control Petition

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between C.Jayaraj Panicker et al vs M.P.Mujeeb Rahman regarding eviction and rent arrears
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Devasya vs V. K.Sasi regarding eviction from shop room
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Vahija et al vs Musthafa Alungal regarding eviction from shop rooms
Rent Control Court/Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Sabira et al vs Hashim Thangal regarding eviction from shop room
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Vahija et al vs Musthafa Alungal regarding eviction.
Rent Control Court/Munsiff-II
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won