| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18576 - 18580 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Mohammed regarding EP 176/2015

KLML130006682015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-04-05

1 years, 8 months, 23 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Musthafa vs Fatheevi et al regarding final decree as per terms of compromise

Interlocutory Application

Original Suit No. 327 of 2014

2019-01-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Fathima.K.K vs Saithalikuttty et al regarding Property Delivery

KLML130007602016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-02-08

0 years, 4 months, 10 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Damodharan et al vs Yahu Haji regarding settlement of original suit.

Restor.Ptn.

KLML130005652016

Malappuram

2017-02-13

0 years, 7 months, 12 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Yahu Haji vs Damodaran regarding setting aside exparte decree

Interlocutory Application

Original Suit No. 104 of 2014

Tirur Taluk

2017-02-13

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Many cases were dismissed because plaintiffs failed to pay necessary court fees or batta required for proceedings.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs frequently lacked adequate evidence to support their claims or prove the means of defendants.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notice

Several cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to properly issue notices to respondents.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Plaintiffs often did not appear in court, leading to automatic dismissal of their cases.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Required Notice

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?