Case Summary
Fathima.K.K is the decree holder seeking the delivery of property. The judgment debtors include Saithalikuttty and others.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
EP
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the delivery of the property to the decree holder.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Property delivered. Delivery effected and it is recorded. Hence EP is closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Fathima.K.K
- Party Age
- 62
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saithalikuttty
- Party Age
- 58
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saleena
- Party Age
- 30
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fathimakutty
- Party Age
- 81
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ayishakutty
- Party Age
- 60
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aminabi.K.
- Party Age
- 56
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.A.Ismail
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Property delivered.
Evidence:
Property delivered. Delivery effected and it is recorded.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
EP
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Fathima.K.K vs Saithalikuttty et al regarding Property Delivery
Case Code Year
Case between Fathima.K.K vs Saithalikuttty et al regarding Property Delivery