| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1806 - 1810 of 21901

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Manakkott Sivanandan vs P.M. Malathy, P.M. Mohandas et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 53/2019

Kozhikode

2025-09-17

approximately-6 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank, Mavoor Road Branch vs Haris Valiyavalappil et al regarding realisation of money from the defendants.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 248/2023

Kozhikode

2025-09-18

approximately-7 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Puthukulangara Musthafa vs Shanoob. V regarding mandatory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 251/2023

Kozhikode

2025-09-18

approximately-4 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Vipin V.R. et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.835/2023

Kozhikode

2025-09-19

approximately-2 months 9 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sajitha. T vs K.K. Ashraf et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 121/2023

Kozhikode

2025-09-19

approximately-3 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9649

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees, resulting in their petitions being dismissed for default.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Several cases were dismissed simply because the plaintiffs did not show up for court hearings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Dismissing petitions due to the plaintiff’s failure to issue required notices to defendants was a common issue.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?