Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 251/2023

Case between Puthukulangara Musthafa vs Shanoob. V regarding mandatory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Savitha T.P
Order Date
2025-09-18
Duration
approximately-4 years 8 months
Case Closed
Thu, 09/18/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Puthukulangara Musthafa filed a suit against Shanoob. V for mandatory injunction due to unauthorized occupation of property. The plaintiff claims arrears of license fee and compensation for the unauthorized occupation of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to vacate the premises and pay the outstanding license fee and compensation for unauthorized occupation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Vacant possession of the plaint schedule building, payment of Rs.4,08,000/- towards arrears of license fee and Rs.51,000/- for unauthorized occupation.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to vacate the premises and pay the outstanding license fee and compensation for unauthorized occupation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established rights under a license agreement and the defendant's unauthorized occupation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established rights under a license agreement and the defendant's unauthorized occupation.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff's contentions were supported by evidence showing the existence of a license agreement and the terms of the agreement were not fulfilled by the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is decreed as follows: 1The defendant is directed to give vacant possession of the plaint schedule building and to remove the articles belonging to him kept in the plaint schedule building within 2 months from the date of decree. 2The defendant is also directed to pay Rs.4,08,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs And Eight Thousand Only) towards arrears of license fee from 1.1.2021 to 11.11.2022.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Puthukulangara Musthafa
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shanoob. V
Party Age
26
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Document No.274/2016, Ext.A1 series, A2
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K. P. Gangadharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. C. Satheesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Eva Zacharia
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Sakkeer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K. Joshila
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to give vacant possession of the plaint schedule building.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to give vacant possession of the plaint schedule building and to remove the articles belonging to him kept in the plaint schedule building within 2 months from the date of decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay Rs.4,08,000/- towards arrears of license fee.
Evidence:
The defendant is also directed to pay Rs.4,08,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs And Eight Thousand Only) towards arrears of license fee from 1.1.2021 to 11.11.2022.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay Rs.51,000/- as compensation for unauthorized occupation.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiffs Rs.51,000/- (Rupees Fifty One Thousand Only) compensation for the unauthorized occupation from 12.11.22 to 05.02.2023 and for two months thereafter.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay the cost of the suit.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay the cost of the suit to the plaintiffs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to assert the plaintiff's claim regarding the license agreement and its revocation.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the delivery of the lawyer notice issued by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type: Undelivered cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the non-receipt of the notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between Puthukulangara Musthafa vs Shanoob. V regarding mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Puthukulangara Musthafa vs Shanoob. V regarding mandatory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 09/18/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Shysi.I vs Kunhahammed regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M. S. Sijin vs Afsal. P regarding mandatory injunction and damages
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Santhakumari Bhaskar et al vs Yasodha.M.P regarding mandatory injunction and arrears of license fee
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between T.Sunitha, T Sushama, T Sushitha vs M.Raveendranath regarding recovery of possession and damages.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sangeetha Puthiyedath vs Janardhanan @ Mani regarding mandatory injunction and damages for illegal use and occupation
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won