| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17876 - 17880 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Vijaya Bank vs M.P.Mohammed Rashid et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 17 OF 2019

2019-10-16

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Haleemu et al vs Ubaid et al regarding injunction and fixation of boundary.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 30 OF 2019

Tirur

2019-10-17

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Illathparambil Moidheenkutty's children vs Biyyakkutty Umma et al regarding eviction.

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 466 OF 2014

2019-10-21

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between N.K.Sanni vs Solaman Thomas regarding execution proceedings.

Execution Proceedings

EP 193/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-10-19

3 years, 2 months, 14 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Nalakath Pareeth vs Thaivalappil Jameela et al regarding Arrears of rent

Execution Petition

EP 138/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-10-18

4 years, 4 months, 24 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required batta, leading to automatic dismissal of their petitions for default.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not presenting convincing evidence of the defendants' means to pay.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Petitions were often dismissed when plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural actions like issuing notices.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Plaintiffs

Cases frequently resulted in dismissal due to the plaintiffs' absence during court proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Absence of the Plaintiffs

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?