ORIGINAL SUIT No. 30 OF 2019

Case between Haleemu et al vs Ubaid et al regarding injunction and fixation of boundary.

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR

Judge

Sri. Jankish Narayanan

Order Date

2019-10-17

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Haleemu, Sulaikha, and Aaminu seeking an injunction and fixation of boundaries against defendants Ubaid, Pathummakkutty, and others. The suit was dismissed for default when the plaintiffs were absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs. The court noted that the plaintiffs did not provide any instruction during the hearing.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs. The court noted that the plaintiffs did not provide any instruction during the hearing.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default. (Pronounced by me in open court, this the 17th day of October, 2019).

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Haleemu
Party Age: 64
Relation: W/o Nellikkal Abdurahiman

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sulaikha
Party Age: 48

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Aaminu
Party Age: 44

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Ubaid
Party Age: 28
Relation: S/o Abu

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Pathummakkutty
Party Age: 64
Relation: W/o Abu

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Muhammedkunhu
Party Age: 34
Relation: S/o Abdul Azeez

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Abdul Azeez
Party Age: 59
Relation: S/o Kunhahammed

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Abdurazakh
Party Age: 62
Relation: S/o Kunhahammed

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. E.K.Noushad
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.K.A.Samad
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Suit is one for injunction and fixation of boundary.

Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification