| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1461 - 1465 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sankaran. P. P vs Vijesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO 3/2024

Nadapuram

2025-09-18

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between AMMAD HAJI vs KUNHAMI et al regarding injunction for property dispute

Civil Suit

OS 21/2025

Nadapuram, Kozhikode District, Kerala

2025-09-18

approximately-6 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between MANAGER, CANARA BANK, KUTTIADI BRANCH vs SHAKE DARWESH, AMMED regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO 105/2025

Nadapuram, Kozhikode District, Kerala

2025-09-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between B. P. Firdous vs Assistant Executive Engineer, PWD et al regarding injunction.

Civil Suit

OS 107/2025

Kozhikode District

2025-09-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs SASI. A. K regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO 50/2025

Nadapuram, Kerala

2025-09-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required batta, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation

Dismissing cases due to the absence of plaintiffs or their representatives in court was common.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to present adequate evidence to support their claims or to demonstrate financial means.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Dismissing cases resulted from plaintiffs' failure to take necessary steps to issue required notices.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Representation

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?