| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1301 - 1305 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Canara Bank vs Sabitha K Sabu et al regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 304/2023

Kottayam

2025-06-30

approximately-8 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd vs E.J. Dileep et al regarding suit dismissal

Civil Suit

OS No. 520/2020

Kottayam

2025-07-03

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Rejimon M.S vs Vinod K.V., Santhosh K.V. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS No. 307/2016

Kottayam

2025-07-09

approximately-9 years 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between V.K.Rajumon vs Subha et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS No.254/2023

Kottayam

2025-07-09

approximately-2 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Manomaniyamma vs Mathew C Thottakkad et al regarding execution of decree

Execution Petition

E.P 15/2024 in O.S 625/1989

Kottayam

2025-07-09

approximately-29 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

38%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Plaintiffs repeatedly failed to pay necessary court fees and batta, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 38 cases (38%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to prove claims or means of respondents, leading to dismissals.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs failed to take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices, which resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Frequently, cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during court hearings.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Required Steps

Absence of the Plaintiff

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?