Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1071 - 1075 of 3169

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Kunnath Rukkiya vs Kalparambil Muhammedali's children regarding Injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 325 OF 2014

Tirur

2017-09-13

3 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between C.Prasannakumari vs Kollanchery Achuthan Nair et al regarding declaration and injunction

Civil Suit - Declaration and Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 4 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-08-31

2 years

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Unnooli vs Noushad et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.284 OF 2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-08-31

2 years and ongoing

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sasi vs Kottuvayal Thottuppurath Ramanunni's Children et al regarding money

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 312 OF 20 15

Tirur

2017-08-31

Approximately 2 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Thirunnavaya Kalathil Karuvattil Ahammed kutty's son; Kammu vs Veeran Haji et al regarding document cancellation and possession recovery

Civil Suit - Cancellation and Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 322 OF 2011

Tirur

2017-08-31

6 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

50%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,169 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 15%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 73 cases)
Commission Report (in 69 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 60 cases)
Tax receipt (in 51 cases)
Agreement (in 43 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1600
Defendant Won: 1076

1076

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

43%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary fees for proceeding, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 43 cases (43%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Plaintiffs were absent during hearings, causing the court to dismiss their cases for non-representation.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs could not present sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Plaintiffs neglected to issue necessary notices to respondents, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Issue Required Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?