Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RCP. No. 16/2024

Case between T V Varghese et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding eviction from rented property

Court
Principal Rent Controller
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-11-25
Duration
approximately-7 years 6 months
Case Closed
Tue, 11/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

T V Varghese, an ex-serviceman and owner of a property, filed a petition for eviction against the State of Kerala's Labour Department. The case revolves around non-payment of rent and the need for the property to start a business for his unemployed son.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition, directing the counter petitioners to vacate the rented building within three months due to the owner's legitimate need for the property for his son’s business.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The petitioner shall be put in vacant possession of the building under Section 11(3) Building Rent Control Act within a period of 3 months.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition, directing the counter petitioners to vacate the rented building within three months due to the owner's legitimate need for the property for his son’s business.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established a bona fide need for the property while the counter petitioners were ready to vacate.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner established a bona fide need for the property while the counter petitioners were ready to vacate.
Supporting Evidence
However petitioner could establish that the original petitioner required the plaint schedule building for the purpose of starting a business for his son.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is allowed as follows: 1.The petitioner shall be put in vacant possession of the building under Section 11(3) Building Rent Control Act within a period of 3 months from this date.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T V Varghese
Party Age
79
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Annamma Varghese
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gilu Varghese
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jino Varghese
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Asst. Labour Officer
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Registered lease agreement executed between the plaintiff and the counter petitioners.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bino I Tom
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vinodji
Appearance Type
Government Pleader

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is granted vacant possession of the building.
Evidence:
In the result, petition is allowed as follows: The petitioner shall be put in vacant possession of the building under Section 11(3) Building Rent Control Act within a period of 3 months from this date.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the ownership of the petitioner over the petition schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the rental arrangement between the petitioner and the counter petitioners.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notifies the counter petitioners of the demand to vacate and the arrears of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence for the sending of legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: A/d Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the delivery of the lawyer's notice to the counter petitioners.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Building Tax Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the tax obligations of the property owned by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between T V Varghese et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding eviction from rented property
Case Code Year
Case between T V Varghese et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding eviction from rented property

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Fri, 06/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 11/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Jacob Punnen et al vs Medcity International Academy Pvt. Ltd. regarding eviction for arrears of rent.
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kainikkara Abdurehiman vs Edasseri Ibrahim's Children et al regarding rent arrears
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Abdurahiman et al vs Rukhiya et al regarding eviction for non-payment of rent
Court of Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kakkuzhiyil Basheer vs Cherukkara Musthafa regarding rent arrears and subletting
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Parambattu Kunheen vs Thadathil Mohammedkutty Haji's children et al regarding rent control dispute
RENT CONTROLLER OF TIRUR
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won