| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 6361 - 6365 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Thekkepurath Beerankutty's son et al vs Kanhirathingal Mammutty & Nedumballi Beepathumma's children et al regarding declaration, way, and perpetual injunction

Declaration, Way, Perpetual Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 287 OF 2012

2019-12-21

7 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Menothiyil Sreenivasan vs Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt.) Ltd et al regarding realization money

realization money

Original Suit NO. 360 OF 2017

2019-12-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jameela vs Hyrunnisa regarding Realization of Money

Realization of Money

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 86 OF 2018

2019-12-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Yogakshemam Loans Ltd., et al vs Asharaf, Sharafudheen, Shameerali regarding Execution of Arbitration Award

Execution Petition

EXECUTION PETITION NO. 113 OF 2018

TIRUR

2019-12-21

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Yogakshemam Loans Ltd., Puthanathani Branch Manager vs Muhammed Shafi regarding Arbitration Award execution

Execution Petition

EXECUTION PETITION NO. 138 OF 2018

TIRUR

2019-12-21

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

23%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed due to not paying necessary fees required for their petitions.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed because plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Petitions were dismissed when plaintiffs failed to take necessary procedural steps in their cases.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Non-Presentation of Documents

Plaintiffs frequently did not present required documents, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Steps

Non-Presentation of Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?